|
Institute for Sustainability and Technology Policy |
|
|
Global sustainability and grass roots development, gender & appropriate technologyContext (12 factors to consider in working with the poor)CONTEXT1. Kondratiev cycle
In other words "COMMUNITY IS NOT A SOFT OPTION" [Professor Robert Putnam, Making Democracy Work: Civic Tradition in Modern Italy, Princeton University Press, 1993] In true grassroots community development the community is encouraged and often re-established as an effective unit in the life of the local people and in the grassroots governance of the region. In particular government accountability is ensured. Often imperialism, globalization and external resources have resulted in the loss of accountability to the poorest. [Top] 2. The Global Poor - 3 Tier TrapTo alleviate poverty it must be worked on at many levels. While this topic focuses on work with and amongst the poor it is important to remember the context. The poor are constrained by 3 levels of influence: Village, National and International The following has been summarized from Worldwatch Paper 92: "Poverty and the environment: reversing the downward spiral", November 1989. Village Level
National Level
International Level
[Top]
3. ConscientizationPaulo Freire, a Brazilian, explored the theme of education and the poor in his book "The Pedagogy of the Oppressed". His insights have had a significant impact on the way the very poor may be facilitated to learn from one another and to grow in a critical perception of the world and the events that impact on them. Many non-government organisations (NGO's) use his ideas directly or indirectly in their group work with the poor. Here is a brief summary of his ideas: Poor oppressed
Participation
Process
Although Paulo Freire's approach implies that the poor are divided and dominated by an elite group, this isn't always the case. In the reading "The green solution for India's poor" inequality is stated by Agarwal to not be a problem in half of India's villages. These villages tend to be in fragile areas where perhaps the cultures have evolved to be more mutually supportive. However even in these villages many of the characteristics described by Freire are still exhibited. Hope has increasingly died away. That does not mean that the poor are without skills. Try living off a $1 per day as many of the poor families do, and see how long you survive! No, they are experts in survival and are experts in understanding much of the natural wealth that surrounds them. That is why, for example, they are often employed by multinational organisations to find and sample local plants. [Top] 4. Participation - a confusing word. Just what does it mean?The concept of participation, and in particular the word itself is frequently used in describing the involvement of the poor in decision-making, programmes and benefits. It has been pointed out, however, that the word 'participation' needs to be critically analysed, otherwise it could or will mean different things to different people. Because of this confusion the word is sometimes deliberately used to imply one thing but to justify another. Here is a list of some of the questions that should be asked when the word participation is used.
[Top]
5. NGO's responses to the needs of the poor has historically taken on various formsIn 1987 Charles Elliot saw the historical change in NGO activity in these terms: Welfare approach:
Development approach
Empowerment approach
By 1990 David Korten was seeing the role of NGO's in even a broader role:
Korten is not saying that the fourth generation is the only important generation. Our focus in this GEI topic is more on the first 3 generations, particularly the second generation. However, there is a need to recognise and encourage NGO's to also participate in the fourth generation. [Top]
6. Grassroots Development ApproachesThe second generation of NGO activity is explored further below. There are various approaches that can be adopted, although in summary there are 2 basic paths out of fatalism and/or divisiveness. Both are in essence involve the people leaning to stand back a little from their circumstances and to become more critically aware of the options open to them. It involves interaction with facilitators, but only as much as necessary to generate small levels of positve change that in turn encourages the poor to tackle other problems. It is a form of education, but not the traditional rote learning or education by deposit (information deposited in the minds of the student). It is better described as a non-formal action/reflection education tackling real issues and promoting real solutions from amongst the people. The two approaches are:
In the case study at the end of this topic, the focus is on the 1st method. There was, however, a limited component of the second approach. Treatment of TB, where good care and followup even in difficult circumstances, produced significant results which in turn generated positive rapport with the people. Likewise the establishment of mother and child health clinics and the involvement of local people in some of the decision making, paved the way for effective community development in some communities. [Top]
7. Program StagesThe approach that Ronald Bunch advocates in his very insightful book (Two Ears of Corn, World Neighbors, 1982) is summarised in the following table and diagram:
Bunch also outlines the Good Program Principles that enable the Program to Achieve its Goals
In essence this is saying that to enable the poor to really get on top of their situation it is important to introduce limited technologies that:
Complex solutions that yield benefits in the long term and that are introduced from the top down, are far less likely to work. Bunch uses the concept of 'hope' as the engine for effective change. In most circumstances the poor have lost hope. An intervention must quickly generate this hope so that the villagers will again take up the potential that is latent within them. [Top]
8. Process Approach: 3 Way FitIntervention amongst the poor often take the form of an imposed solution from experts, the so called engineered blueprint approach. Korten (1980) researched successful NGO operations and came up with this conceptual understanding of how best to work with people that the organisation wants to see benefit. Flow of information between the 3 main ingredients must be integrated. The organisation must be able to listen to the beneficiaries who in term need to learn to clearly express their needs. Likewise the program needs to fit the needs of the people, not primarily the expertise of the organisation. If the program doesn't fit then the expertise of the organisation will need to change to insure that it does. It is a process approach where the beneficiaries and the organisation truly learn from one another, but the key is that the beneficiaries do benefit. Over time the interlinks continue to evolve as "development" is a process not a fixed achievable goal.
[Top]
9. International support for co-operation of 'all' in development activitiesStatements from international forums recognise the importance of involving all people in sustainable development activities. The rhetoric, however, is often louded than actual commitment. The Rio Declaration on Environment and Development (1992)
International Conference on Population & Development in Cairo (Sept 1994)
[Top]
10. Program Learning CurveKorten goes on to say that organisations need to evolve over time, from not only learning to be effective, but to learning to achieving this effectively and building in momentum so that the benefits multiply to many others in an expansion phase. Too often NGO's have been effective in a very limited way. The needs are great and the benefits need to flow onto many.
[Top]
11. The Third Sector - NGO's (Governments and Corporations are the first 2 sectors)A recent report from the Wordwatch institute distributed by e-mail on 29 October, 1999 Curtis Runyan's article, "Action on the Front Lines," looks at the growing power of nongovernmental organizations in influencing and setting policies that were formerly the preserve of governments and corporations. Through their international connections and networks, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) are giving local concerns global platforms--connecting the hundreds of millions people who belong to grassroots, community organizations that are working in small but significant ways to change the status quo. This chaotic "third sector" is charting a new course deep into the waters long ruled by nations and corporations. And increasingly, its swelling numbers, size, complexity, and effectiveness are compelling the two traditional sectors to change. [Top] 12. The 'Bare Foot' BankGrameen (Village) Bank in Bangladesh is an interesting example of how the poor, without capital, can be provided with credit. This link takes you to the BareFoot Bank article (Brisbane Institute) that explores a way that a western city can learn from the Village Bank experience in Bangladesh. [Top]
CASE STUDYThis case study is set in the Chalna Thana (small administrative area) in the Khulna District of Southwest Bangladesh. The project is under the overall management of a small NGO called HEED Bangladesh (the word HEED is derived form Health, Education and Economic Development). While reviewing the case study ask yourself the question, " How well does the project match the criteria introduced above?" [Top] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||