Community Participation in the Development of Permaculture in Sukabumi,
Indonesia
by Harry Harsono Amir ISTP, Murdoch University, Australia
Introduction
In the 1970s, during the first Five Year Development Plan, the
Indonesian Government undertook a thorough reform of the agricultural sector in
order to attain self-sufficiency in food production, particularly rice. The
green revolution in agriculture began with initiatives to raise production by
encouraging farmers to increase the use of chemical fertilizer and pesticides,
and new varieties of paddy. The use of local varieties of paddy was forbidden
by law which was enforced by heads of villages with the assistance of
BABINSA (village level army personnel). Other changes introduced by the
Government included a new variety of hybrid chicken, which is highly productive
in a short period of time, and a move from mixed farming to monoculture.
The introduction of green revolution technologies undoubtedly
brought Indonesia close to self-sufficiency in food production by 1984.
However, a few years later the production of rice levelled off and Indonesia was
forced to import grain once again. The fall in production was mainly the result
of an outbreak of insects known as brown plant hoppers (Nilapervata sp)
which had become resistant to pesticides. The Government acted to ban certain
pesticides and implement integrated pest management but there is no question
that the environment was already badly affected. Despite regreening and
reforestation programs implemented by the Government, there has been widespread
poisoning of the land by chemical fertilizers, a reduction in genetic diversity
through the loss of local paddy varieties, and pollution of soil and groundwater
by pesticides. In up-land areas, soil degradation has resulted from
inappropriate farming techniques.
Despite the involvement of experts in the design of integrated
pest management and regreening projects, and Government claims to the contrary,
they have largely been unsuccessful. Most farmers have not implemented
integrated pest management strategies. They have become accustomed to
pesticides which have immediate effects, and they perceive integrated techniques
as overly time-consuming. Regreening programs have not identified the
socio-economic and cultural factors behind soil degradation and have
consequently failed to gain the participation of farmers. Rehabilitation of
degraded land should be based on the enhancement of synergy, partnership and the
active participation of farmers in order to fulfill their needs and aspirations.
So far, the success for regreening critical land has never reached more than 70
percent. It can be concluded, then, that the methods currently in use for
attaining self-sufficiency in food production and in improving the quality of
the environment are neither effective nor sustainable. It is argued that
Government roles should be limited in these areas and efforts should be directed
at empowering and enabling the local communities. An alternative approach must
be sought which is beneficial to the environment, and also takes into
consideration the socio-economic and cultural aspects of the local people.
Permaculture as an Alternative Approach
The English term for this alternative approach is 'permaculture' or permanent agriculture as set out by Mollison
(1988). This agriculture is intensive, uses a mixture of species and layers of
activity similar to a forest, it recycles all waste, uses organic principles of
pest-management, and builds up the soil with compost and earthworms. To
Sundanese people (from West Java) this approach is well known as kebon
talun. In different parts of Indonesia it may have different names,
however, the principles are the same: to achieve maximum productivity from a
piece of land with minimum inputs of energy and effort. Kebon talun
(ortalun) is regarded as a transition stage between shifting cultivation
and permanent agriculture. As the Indonesian way of life became more settled
than nomadic, species of hardwood, softwood and bamboo were preserved in their
gardens. Seeds discarded from fruits such as avocado (Persea americana),
mangga (Mangifera indica), rambutan (Nephilium lapaceum), durian
(Durio zybethenus), salak (Salaca edulis), sawo (Achras
zapota), and kedondong (Spondeas dulchis) germinated beneath the
hardwoods. And cassava, corns, taro, vegetables, ornamental and medicinal
plants were grown in the lower strata.
The garden is rich in biodiversity and mimics the stratification
which naturally occurs in tropical rain forests. The stratification of plant
species is efficient in capturing energy from sunlight and is more productive
than a monoculture farming system with a high input of chemical fertilizers and
pesticides. The talun system was also able to maintain pest species
populations in balance with their predators in a similar way to that achieved in
natural ecosystems. Consequently, they do not require the use of pesticides.
The soil in a talun system is continually enriched by fallen leaves and
tree-trunks. Natural fertilizers consisting of chicken, goat, cow and buffalo
manure, are sometimes added to the soil by farmers.
Through the integration of ecological components in the
talun system, the well-being of the farmers is maintained. Produce can
be harvested year round and they can sell the surplus to the local market.
Hardwood and bamboo is available for furniture and building materials. Cassava
(Manihot esculenta), corn (Zea mays), sweet potato (Ipomea
batatas) and taro provide carbohydrates. Tropical fruits and vegetables
supply vitamins and minerals. Various herbs, such as ganda rusa (justicia
gandarussa), cabe jawa (Retrofracti fructus), kapulaga (Amomum
kepulaga), asem jawa (Thalinum paniculata), tapak dara (Vinca
rosea), and temulawak (Curcuma xanthorrhiza) are used as traditional
medicines. It can be concluded, then, that the principles of talun are
economically viable, environmentally sustainable and culturally acceptable for
most Indonesian farmers. Unfortunately, this eco-sustainable agricultural
practice is slowly disappearing, replaced by highly inefficient monoculture
farming.
The History of Sukabumi
Sukabumi is the largest regency in West Java province, and has
the lowest income per capita. Except in the volcanic mountainous areas, soils
are mostly poor with thin topsoil, suitable only for plantation or forest. The
livelihood of the people, particularly in the southern areas, is largely
dependent on tea, coffee and rubber plantations which have occupied these areas
since Dutch colonisation.
Under the cover of plantation crops, and with good soil
management, degradation of the land rarely occurred. However, as the price of
tea, coffee and rubber dropped, many of these plantations became bankrupt. The
plantation labourers who lost their livelihood occupied much of the land and
began to replace the plantations with monoculture cash crops, such as potatoes,
vegetables and carrots. The majority of these former labourers lacked the
skills and resources to manage the land. The combination of inappropriate land
management, topography, soil type and climate caused the land to become degraded
in most areas which were formerly plantations.
Beginnings of the Eco-Friend Project
The rehabilitation of degraded land in Sukabumi is imperative to
restoring soil productivity and the well-being of local farmers. Government
efforts have clearly not been successful. Talun offers an alternative
approach for the rehabilitation of land. From an economic perspective,
talun is able to produce cash crops with high financial returns, such as
traditional varieties of chicken, orchids, medicinal plants, bamboo and fruits.
In regards to the environment, a talun system can reduce energy inputs
and recycle waste outputs.
It is difficult, however, to convince farmers that the use of
talun principles can restore degraded lands, maintain soil productivity,
increase biodiversity and keep the population of pests in balance. An
Eco-Friend Project (run by the author) was started in Sukabumi in 1990 to
demonstrate the value of talun principles. The demonstration project
includes at least ten local varieties of chicken, 45 species of medicinal herbs,
several types of bamboo (bamboo bitung Dendrocalamus asper, bamboo apus
Gigantochloa apus, bamboo gombong Gigantochloa verticillata,
bamboo tutul Bambusa vulgaris), softwoods and hardwoods. Vermiculture
has also recently been introduced.
Various initiatives have been undertaken to encourage farmers to
implement the talun principles, including instruction in talun
methods. Informal meetings were held to air the problems, aspirations and hopes
of the local farmers. They were informed of the benefits of conserving genetic
biodiversity, particularly of local chicken species and medicinal plants. Some
practical training in raising a local variety of chicken and in the use of
Effective Micro-organism 4 (EM4) to speed the compost process was also provided.
Farmers interested in growing medicinal plants were provided with the species
they required from the author who grew the plants and bred the chickens in his
suburban home. In one initiative, 452 local chickens were distributed amongst
115 households with varying levels of income. The chickens belonged to
different varieties, each with its own characteristics but all with a higher
economic return than other chickens. They included kedu hitam, kedu putih,
pelung, nunukan, cemani, sentul and lamongan. Farmers successful in raising the
chickens must, after one year, give a chicken of the same variety to their
neighbour.
Achievements
Some participants in the Eco-Friend Project have been very
successful. They have been able to diversify their activities to include
raising worms, hares and goats. Some have even begun a business initiative,
such as the production of compost using the EM4 microorganisms. Around sixty
percent of the farmers involved in the project, however, failed even in raising
the chickens. The farmers are poor and many sold or ate the chickens, some
reported that mongoose, feral cats or dogs ate the chickens, while others stated
that there was no market for their product and they were forced to abandon their
activities. Few wealthy farmers have attempted to rehabilitate their land using
the talun methods.
Looking Forward
Future efforts will be directed towards finding cooperative and business partners
to market the products of permaculture. One business partner already established
has begun a 'show-room' for such products in
Bogor. Credit for poor farmers is also expected to be a result of the
cooperative activities.
Communities will be encouraged to develop traditional 'eco-cottages' and offer eco-tourism packages for visitors to create
alternative income-generating activities. Landless and poor farmers could
participate in the development of a small-scale home industry scheme, such as
the production of bamboo carvings and furniture. Employment would also be
available for eco-tour guides and home stay managers. These activities will
require assistance from a travel bureau, particularly for marketing, as the
communities have limited skill or experience in these areas.
Conclusions
In conclusion, the Eco-Friend Project has not as yet been
completely successful. More resources for the poor farmers are required.
Cooperatives could play a more significant role in providing credit for farmers.
Other income-generating activities, such as eco-tourism packages and small-scale
home industries, could work to lessen the pressure on the land. Business
partnerships need to be developed for the marketing of talun and home
industry products, and the promotion of eco-tourism.
Reference
Mollison, W. (1998) Permaculture: A Designer's
Manual, Tagari, NSW.
Questions for Discussion
- What are the characteristics of permaculture and how
do they apply to traditional agriculture?
- Can a project like Sukabumi be duplicated elsewhere
or is it a one off?
Photos

Photo 1 House in Bogor used by the author to develop
the Sukabumi permaculture project.

Photo 2Compost and herb garden used to develop
seedlings for Sukabumi.

Photo 3Aquatic plants and fish pond area on roof of
authors house.

Photo 4Javanese chickens raised in author's house
for Sukabumi.

Photo 5Chicken coops in backyard.

Photo 6Degraded hill sides of Sukabumi.

Photo 7 Rehabilitating valley of Sukabumi -
view from authors house.


Photo 8 and 9Rare species and common species mixed
together on intensive garden.

Photo 10Author and wife with special compost
starter.

Photo 11 Members of
Sukabumi co-op who use the chickens and plants
provided by the author and then pass them on to other co-op
members.

Photo 12 Chicken coop in Sukabumi villager
house.

Photo 13Author with chicken coop in Sukabumi
home.
|